On an interview, Gladwell came up with a cultural explanation on why Asian students score higher on math tests compared to American students and the rest of the world. Gladwell believes the answer lies with rice cultivation, which takes three times more effort to cultivate compared to wheat. The tradition of necessary hard work required to raise rice paid big dividends down the line since improving math scores, contrary to popular belief, takes hard work rather than raw talent.
To simplify, Gladwell argues the culture of hard work enables Asian students to score higher on math tests compared to their Western counterparts.
Do I agree with Gladwell? Not entirely. Do I disagree with him? No. I do not know the answer, so I cannot criticize nor approve of his theory. But as far as my opinion goes, I believe Gladwell may have a point. It may not be the only factor, but it may be a factor.
Obviously, some big questions must be answered for anyone to agree with Gladwell. I will list a few (but not all)
1. What about differences in educational systems? What about economic factors?
2. Do Asian cultures really value hard work more than Western cultures?
3. Do all rice cultivating cultures score high in math tests? And why only math? Shouldn't Asians excel at nearly everything then?
4. What matters more in math? Practice or talent?
My thoughts on all four questions:
1. Yes, differences in educational systems, along with economics, will play a huge factor (obviously). To my understanding, economic levels did not play a significant role in this case because only data from developed nations were collected. But if you look at the data in US alone, self-identified Asian students almost always score higher than any other racial groups in SAT tests. I don't mean to sound like a racist, but if you only included East Asians (from developed nations), I believe the average math score for Asians would increase even more.
But why do Asians score so much higher on SATs? Possibly because many of them attend SAT schools? May be, but that would help Gladwell's argument - Asian kids score better because they work harder and practice more. May be the so called "fobs," or the recent immigrants, skew the average score though most fobs I know did not score high on SAT math due to language barriers (you still need English to read the questions).
2. From my experience yes. American coaches often tell their players to just have fun. Do Korean tell their players to "have fun?" no. They tell their players to win.
Even popular comics, such as "Dragon Ball," stresses hard work and enduring hardships. Does Superman and Spider man stress hard work? Hardly. They obviously go through struggles but gain their powers by birth or freak accident, while the main character from the Dragon Ball slowly improves his abilities through years and years of practice. Personally, I have never seen superman practicing punching or weight lifting. In Ranma 1/2, the main characters constantly practice martial arts.
The above examples illustrate hard work engraved in Japanese culture, but does not provide convincing evidence. But consider the fact developed Asian countries have some of the highest work hours per week (though Americans work a lot as well). They have longer school hours as well.
3. Do all rice cultivating cultures have high math scores? I don't know. But as many South Eastern economies develop, they should provide more interesting data.
4. What matters more in math? Talent or hard work? I shall talk about this at a later time, but I believe hard work matters more.
Now, no one claims that all Asians excel at math, so please don't comment "well, I'm Asian and I suck at math." In fact, none of the people that read my blog (all Asian) seem to enjoy math.
I hope I didn't sound too much like a racist.
anyways, here's a picture:
